Friday, 18 July 2014

Watching You Watching Me

Feast your eyes folks. There's so much of this shit I didn't want to drown you in an OCEAN of shite so here's a few snap shots of the freaks at work in their little and lonely cave. Enjoy the weekend

The media are definitely trying to tie Morrisson to Bryn Estyn instead of anywhere else, which is what Channel4 did....More distraction perhaps?

Did you see Jen's comment on the Outlaw tonight? She seems pretty certain there is media involvement with the troll team. Will Black, Tom Pride, Gojam are almost certainly linked to the Media and have political links too.. Makes a lot of sense. In fact I may even discuss it with Barbara Hewson at some stage on Twitter :)
It would be great if Jen hits the Hag with a civil suit and the Dutch Police rock up to question her at the same time

Mildred(Grouchy aka Martyrpope on Icke). Seems this guy is pulling some strings that make others dance
They are desperately trying to draw people into an argument which isn't going to happen. Stand by your words Outlaw and don't give them anymore airtime, cuts off their oxygen supply :)

Absolutely Mildred... This place will be the only place I will even discuss them now. None of them will ever see what is on here so they cannot feed off it..

This Forum is designed to be a safe haven for people to speak their minds without fear of being trolled or their words being used elsewhere.

Don't underestimate her though Jane. She may be a thick bitch, but she has money to burn and she did not get that Huffington Post gig for nothing. There is something/someone behind her pulling strings and I think that Jen is not far off with her thoughts about it being Media-Related.

I still have the email that Lav sent to me when he wanted to sue Will Black and the Huff Post using Carter-Ruck.

They said they needed two grand up front before they would even consider it.

Janette may have that sort of Cash to burn, but Carter-Ruck would not go after me as I am skint and there is no profit in it for them.... Hag is just another scabby cash cow for him, nothing more.

The ever so lovely Jane Russell aka fake account to support itself. Probably a close family member of chimp.

Yeah, I know, hag has covered her arse slyly too in many ways. I think the super whacko act is also a safeguard -
it inspires people to think she's just a net nutter, so if anyone starts looking too closely, they soon lose interest in watching her cobblers.
There is no way any of this is random meets that's for sure, definitely media with a little help from 'others'.

Hadn't noticed before Jimmy what you said about Baloney (I'm on a "device", and a pretty shit one at that).
A bit like Tweedledum twigging that Tweedledee isn't all there, from where I'm standing! Or Bill & Ben! Got to give BBC a call - I see another series in this!

All snuggly buggly in there? 

Nope, I have the feeling that it isn't them writing it, or they are simply spreading disinfo, as not only are they pimping the Noodle, the Noodle article they have linked to was from Kaz Tiggr's blog 'Fighting Back'... Stinks to hell and back

Just popped over to Icke Savile thread.. It does appear to be running out of steam now at long last, just Arsecheeks still pimping out how the MP's are gonna save us from those pesky Paedo's...
IWTT is also phoning every MSM outlet too..

Check out the show on Sonia Poulton where Sonia interviews Scriptonite too if you get the chance Jane, I think it's the third one in. I had a bit of a catch up last night and I really wish I hadn't now as Sonia did not respond when Mendoza mentioned she was working with Tom Pride....

JR. If you turn the initials round you get RJ

Sounds like Babs will soon be public enemy number 1 if she keeps mentioning BE.
Does she not know she has to get a special permit just for mentioning that place?
Think everyones been calling her a #paedoprotector.
She might be needing 'Daves' number too if she's not careful.
Hope she's read your fine articles on the subject. She might learn even more if she does.
I'll have a catch up on Babs & will hit up the Outlaw comments if I have an questions
I wonder if anyone will mention Peter Morrison today

New member who'll remain anonymous 
I've been reading the outlaw blog for a while, I commented on a post over Christmas (along the lines of "don't let the trolls get you down" and keep up the good work ie the posts) and today I see The Outlaw has a new forum so being the inquisitive fool I am I signed up maybe expecting to read more of the same but without the references to the ongoing battle (which I know little about) the outlaw has with twitter and co

Happy to prove I am who I am but I ain't doing no dodgy initiation stuff, ok

Fair enough mate.   The Outpost was set up as a place online which will remain free from the trolling and infantile cliqués that have built up.

Obviously it's early days as this is a completely new forum, but the name and the web space is paid for and is not going anywhere soon.

I and others will be putting stuff on here that will not be available elsewhere, including the Outlaw, there are some trustworthy people on board who I will 100% vouch for. (Some, indeed)
You are welcome to read whatever is on here, post anything interesting, ask questions, whatever.
It will be like nothing else online if you are familiar with Forums, with no hierarchy or bullshit..
Give it a chance, you may get a lot from it.(or you may not as is the case lol)

A Denial of Service attack is normally carried out by a Botnet. A Botnet is a network home/office PCs and servers in remote locations on the internet which have been infected with a virus and have fallen under the control of a malicious group. These groups then rent time on this network to individuals or organisations who wish to carry out DDoS attacks.

The compromised machines will simply flood the target website with traffic which is often indistinguishable from normal visits until the server or network infrastructure is saturated, degrading service for normal visitors.

Why do people wish to carry out a DDoS attack?

Sometimes it’s to obtain a financial ransom; the attackers will contact the site they plan to attack and demand money. If the money is not paid, they attack the site and increase the ransom.

Sometimes it’s for moral/religious reasons; they object to the content of the website and wish to make it unavailable to visitors.

Sometimes there is no obvious reason, however this is rare since renting time on a botnet is relatively expensive.

Where the traffic is not interactive, the attacking PCs open connections without sending any traffic or simply flood the target IP with random bytes of data. Unless the website has a dedicated IP, it is impossible to determine the target.

Somewhere Only We know....................pmsl

Wednesday, 16 July 2014

Female Troll Jane Russell

"I was wondering whether any residents who raped their peers in kids homes are keeping a low profile or whether any are gobbing off trying to intimidate people into silence or to make it look like they are a Mother Superior in the anti CSA cause.

All we hear about is abuse by Staff, but it shouldn’t be forgotten that some of the kids were animals & used rape of their peers as a filthy control method (apart from other things) to make ‘em feel well ‘ard."

(Failing to address the question; Why did her champion victim have his photo taken in almost the same place and position as me, only 25 years later. She mocks two of the smallest animals on earth.)

On another note, I was thinking of getting a Yorkshire Terrier. Thought it might make me look menacing. Grrrrrr!

Don’t mess with my handbag hound he’ll give you a nasty nip hahahahahahaha

Picture source is unknown :-) 

My favourite Internet news knob namely Old Git followed with this beauty of a comment. xx

I said,on a previous post,on a previous article,that from what I have read here,over a period of time, Mr. Daring Lavatory is VERY definitely under the control & payment of MI5/& or/Special Branch.

How else could he get away with all the shi*t he’s doing?

He HAS to discredit Outlaw, or a future enquiry, with Outlaw giving factual evidence, could blow the roof off of the official story.

Back to Jane Russell   July 15, 2014 at 8:58 am said:

It is extremely strange how he has ticked the box for every criteria for stalking and harassment 10 times over according to the Legal Guidance by the CPS and the only 1 who doesn’t seem to see it is the person who decided there wasn’t enough evidence to show it was directed at J. Wonder how much he gets paid to be that blind.

YES – EXTREMELY STRANGE INDEED OG! Did he only get the charge he got because there was a very reliable witness on the scene and therefore they had no choice but to charge him? Would they have let him off that charge if the very reliable witness was not physically present?

Wonder if the public can send off FOI requests to find out which Senior Police Officers are Freemasons.

I also wonder if the same condition will apply as with Hillsborough to the CSA Inquiry where the relatives insisted that Freemason Police had nothing to do with the re-investigation.
If not, this new CSA Inquiry will be just the same as Waterhouse, a load of old lies and not worth the paper it’s written on, let alone the millions that will be wasted on these new investigations.

Trouble is, all this pandemonium is orchestrated as much as possible. The people don’t even realise that they are possibly nudging the genuine survivors over the cliff of no return.

Is anyone really daft enough to think that the truth will out and that the real top tree wrong ‘uns will ever get their rightful punishment?

1st rule of Government – don’t believe a word they say.

2nd rule, when they say it’ll be an ‘Independent’ Inquiry, you know they are lying. They always hold the strings. Nothing is Independent where HM Corruption HQ are concerned


The screen shots below were grabbed from an account that attempted to gain access to a baby swimming school's Facebook account. The baby swimming schools account contains pictures of parents and babies during swimming classes and underwater photo shoots. Among the pictures are pictures of solicitors, police support staff, police officers, RAF pilots, teachers, GP's as well as many other professionals, and their babies. The incident was reported as a matter of urgency and is now in the hands of those best qualified to deal with it.

The women in the imagine is posing as pregnant. Why? 
Friends on list the Jane Russell account

Friday, 11 July 2014

MORE MORE MORE (Troll Troll Trolling Along)

This is doing the rounds on the net too. The same name appears many times on the comment section of a blog which sounds similar to shout whore. All very pally pally and supportive of each other. Can you tell what it is yet? Go on have a guess. Oops nearly forgot, the same account/name/shill accused me of rape. Never offered any evidence of it but hey who needs evidence its the internet and anything goes. Not quite the same as real life is it?

Embedded image permalink

Another e-mail from last May. Any allegations of me being a troll for 2 years should be dispelled by this. Below is the work of a particular impotent internet troll associated with my other trolls....aka #teamoutlaw Grouchy aka Martyrpope aka Mildred Pilchard aka too many to list. A recent death death from him was reported and by pure coincidence the police oop north knew of him. His name isn't Keith but just another alias. He thinks he an artist too. pmsl

Most of you will be aware of my fuck ups. My biggest being a deaf dumb blind dick who was manipulated by these experienced internet trolls. None of the below is edited.

From: kkandm <>
To: realjimmyjones <>
Sent: Wed, 22 May 2013 17:20
Subject: It's a long one.

Alright mate,
Just putting in writing what we talked about this morning so you can see how I see it from the outside.
Facts are you,Darren,Messham and Gregory were all in the care system along with thousands of others.
You all share in common a time at Bryn Estyn.
You're all aware of the abuses that went on both there and the wider system.
Then the whistle is blown by Alison Taylor foremost and the cover-up begins.A cover-up pre designed.
Messham and to an extent Gregory are part of that cover-up designed to protect big fish both locally and nationally.
Their voices and versions are the only ones heard and pushed by a media who themselves are involved in the cover-up.
This involves incriminating innocent staff members to protect the guilty.
McAlpine is implicated by Messham.But willingly in return for a fat wallet.
He allows the story to circulate and allows Messham,who is on his team to spread the story.
All the time they have an exit plan,
By using his own principles he will be declared innocent by the very man who originally named him by stating a case of
mistaken identity and making it impossible for anyone else to accuse him.
At the same time his wealth increases and no doubt Messham is looked after.

For years the story only circulates in little read Scallywag,Private Eye,Icke etc.Then the internet takes over.
Elm GH scandal breaks after Savile dies,calls for a new inquiry into N Wales.Specifically N Wales.
Bryn Estyn is the focus.A deliberate distraction perhaps to the wider Bryn Alyn Community.
McAlpine wasn't there because Messham has now said so.He's safe.
One man has come out on TV as saying specifically McAlpine is not a paedophile.Messham.

However,there is a problem.
You and Darren and others in the background know that Messham is a liar.And also an abuser himself.
Messham is protected though,by powerful people and rewarded for sticking to their agenda.
For them,Messham can be the only authoratative voice on care home abuse.
His health and mental state are then used to garner sympathy for him making it unthinkable that anyone would doubt
what he has to say after all his suffering.
Anyone who doubts Messham is obviously a deranged bully and paedo protector.
That's you and Darren and those that believe you.Me,Kate,Jane Mooch and anyone who dares support you.
But we're not being accused by the big fish.No.They've got some small fry doing their dirty work.
All sorts of lunatics,non-entities and conspiracy theorists whose basis for attacking you is the defence of Steve Messham.
Jan - a vicious god bothering victim junkie.
Sue- a perpetual lunatic hypochondriac.
In all their various guises to make them appear popular.And all their delude hangers on.
Adeybob-a total lunatic,useful idiot with a possible socially dangerous demeanour.
Paul-an opinionated pervy looking bloke who appears as the others are struggling to get their message across.
Will Black-a self proclaimed writer/journo.His aim is to continue discrediting you and Darren and your support.For his book.
Gojam- a self interested wannabe journo who feeds the press victims stories for money
Madlands-Didn't believe Messham or Mary Moss then starts a hashtag campaign in support of their stories.Then fucks off in the huff.
Dr Tig-Looking to make a name for herself as a so called expert with a pretence of helping victims.
James Reeves-has a tale to tell.Most of it imagined or at least embellished.Never ceases tweeting abuse stories.
And many many more.
Then we have David Icke,who drops everything to meet you personally.Strange.
He slanders McAlpine for years,yet no action is taken.He is friends with David Shayler,still rumoured to have MI5 links.
A friend of Alex Jones,a rumoured US shill.
Shayler has connections to Paul through the GANDALF trial wher his barrister was the eminent Ken MacDonald QC.
A possible deliberate action to get Paul removed from trial to keep his cover ?
Shayler and then girlfriend Annie Machon also MI5 lived at Belinda MacKenzies house.
Belinda fronts the Hollie Greig campaign and rumoured to be profiting from its disinfo.
She was previously involved in Iran Aid and alleged to be involved in a £5million fraud and was a front for going to war.
One of her biggest backers is Icke,especially on the Hollie Greig story.
Is she involved somewhere in this .Is Icke.And are they involved in keeping a lid on the truth you and Darren hold.
Is will involved with Icke.Probably.
Whatever it is mate,you and Darren are doing a grand job and we will find out.I'll help you any way I can.
You'll have your day.
All the best,Keith.

Monday, 30 June 2014

Bryn Estyn-more truths that don't suit the MSM

Two clips from Peter Wynne's evidence. The first speaks for itself and completely trashes all lies written about him. No sucking dogs penis's you'll notice because it never happened. No suicidal tendencies due to bullying and no mention of being a victim of such bullying. Anyone who's claimed as much in the last few months has a head full of fantasies and fabrications. In other words they're full of shite(and this has been repeatedly proven by me at least, er..... five times.

"It seemed cruel now but that's how kids are. I enjoyed my time at Bryn Estyn over all, it was the best home I was in". (June 10th 1997)

The second comment supports my statement here that this incident is a complete fabrication on behalf of the witness. The very same witness who claims to have been sexually abused by a senior ranking policeman and a politician who's well known. See previous blogs here

"The incidents apparently occurred between S****** H***** and Paul Wilson, a member of staff, whereby Mr. Wilson assaulted him with the use of a crowbar. I do not recall any such incident neither do I recall SH being thrown into the river. I can confirm, however, that Mr. Wilson used to take me and other boys canoeing to Llangollen"(June 10th 1997)

I still visit the places we used to go canoeing. I obtained employment there after I left Bryn Estyn and thoroughly enjoyed my time working on the canals. Peter Wynne however, didn't live long enough to enjoy and re-live the pleasant memories many of us have of those days. Of course it was rough and it was hard but we were tough boys from tough backgrounds and all in all we got over it and moved on. Peter's domestic situation led him to take his own life at a very young age. It became apparent to those that knew him that Peter couldn't deal with what the real world was offering. Pain, hurt, embarrassment, credibility issues, employment, children, home life and other factors led to Peter thinking the only way out was another way. The end of a rope. RIP lad we'll defend your name till death comes for us all. As for those who continue to slander his reputation......wait and see.

("While talking to a friend a few days later, it became abundantly clear that the doubts I had initially felt about the content of the Laverty video, were in fact, justified".... Jan 23rd 2014) < really>?

Tuesday, 24 June 2014

Child Abuse Fabrication Difficulties.

The following is taken from a statement made to the Waterhouse Inquiry. The reference to a bloody anus has been used by an Internet troll to support his fabricated allegations  . Unfortunately, he got the information from me. So I can and  have evidenced the lies. Read the bullshit and make up your own minds as to whether the police have had an easy job or not. Pallial might have a word too.

"I am a native of Cardiff.On Tuesday 20th August 1991 I made a written statement to the police regarding events that occurred whilst I was at Bryn Estyn boys' home in Wrexham. I would now like to add the following two events".

"Whilst at Bryn Estyn I went with about ten other boys on a canoeing trip. I believe we went to a location quite near to Llangollen. I am uncertain of the date.We travelled from Bryn Estyn in the school minibus with one member of staff, Paul Wilson. We took about five or six canoes and they were carried on the roof rack of the minibus. We were going to use the canoes on the canal. We drove along a dirt track type road. This road went over small bridge over the canal. The minibus was parked up close to the bridge. The canoes were taken off the mini bus and put in the water. All the boys changed out of their day clothes and into shorts and T‑shirts. The majority of boys got into the canoes and went off along the canal, leaving behind Mr. Wilson, two boys and myself. Mr. Wilson explained how to get in and out of the moving canoe to the two boys and myself. The canoe was at that time in the water. Mr. Wilson had referred to me several times by a nickname he used, "Handbag". Mr. Wilson had control of the canoe. He was holding the canoe paddle and the end was in the cockpit of the canoe. Mr. Wilson began to walk towards the bridge and towed the canoe behind him. The two boys walked alongside Mr. Wilson. I walked a short distance behind. I couldn't hear what they were talking about. They laughed several times. When they went under the bridge, Mr Wilson pulled the nose of the canoe out of the water and all three turned to face me. Mr. Wilson then said to me something similar to, "Come and suck these two off and then me". I understood by that that he wanted me to suck the penises of the two boys and then his. I refused. Mr. Wilson repeated his request and I again refused. Mr Wilson approached me. He brought his arm around and struck me on the back. He repeated his request. This time he was more aggressive. Again I refused. Mr. Wilson walked off towards the mini‑bus. He never said anything. The two boys stood in front of me. They seemed bewildered.Mr. Wilson then returned from the mini‑bus. I could see that he was carrying what appeared to be a crowbar. It had a hooked end with a nail extractor on the end. The van had been parked about thirty feet away.Mr. Wilson struck me with the crowbar across my back. He then grabbed at my T‑shirt and ripped it off. He also ripped off my shorts. I was not wearing any underpants. I was then standing naked. The next thing I knew was that Mr. Wilson was pushing the end of the crowbar, the end with the hook and nail extractor, up my back passage. I knew that the end of the crowbar had actually entered my back passage because I felt pressure in my stomach. He was moving the crowbar about and then he pushed me into the water. The crowbar remained stuck in my back passage. I was completely submerged in the water. As I got to the surface, Mr. Wilson pushed me back under the water using the canoe paddle. He pushed me under the water several times with the paddle. On each occasion I managed to fight back to the surface and was able to take a breath of air. I am unable to recall how many times he actually pushed me under the water.From what I can recall, the two boys stopped Mr.Wilson and I was able to climb out of the water on to the bank. By this time, Mr. Wilson had moved away from the bank.The two boys never said anything to me when I got out of the water. I think they had been frightened by what had happened.It was only when I had climbed back on to the bank that I took the crowbar out of my back passage. A short time later, I went back to the mini‑bus and dressed. I don't know where Mr. Wilson was at that time.When I removed the crowbar from my back passage, I noticed that I was bleeding. I saw a lot of blood was running down my leg. I can't recall what I did with the crowbar. I think I may have left it at the canal bank.When this incident occurred, the remainder of the boys were some distance away and I don't think they would have seen what occurred. On the return journey nothing was said by any of the boys about what had happened and Mr. Wilson never spoke to me.Since that date, no‑one has ever mentioned the incident to me. Since that date, I have had recurring nightmares over this incident. It has affected my life to such an extent that I will never have a bath, I will only shower. Prior to that incident, I was quite a proficient swimmer. Since that date, I am terrified of going anywhere near water of any depth..The boys on the trip that I can recall are Darren Laverty, P** T*****, F*** H*****, Peter Wynne, someone called Ashley or Danny, also M**** H****** and John Parrot. I don't recall which two boys were present when the incident took place. I continued to bleed from my back passage for several hours". (blood on sheets reference made by another liar, scratch, er..maybe 5 times)

I was there and it never happened.
His evidence continues.

"Howarth wanted to see me in his flat. I asked why and he said that my place was not to ask. I went to Mr Howarth's flat. I remember that it was a Saturday afternoon, the majority of the boys were out. In fact, I can only recall seeing Peter Wynne in the building. He was on punishment and was scraping weeds from the gaps in the patio. I went to the flat and Peter Howarth let me in. He told me to go into the lounge. When I went into the lounge I saw Paul Wilson. He was sitting down by the coffee table. There were cans of beer on the coffee table, about six cans. There were about five magazines on the coffee table. They were sexually explicit. Some were open and I could see pictures of naked men and women in sexual poses.Paul Wilson got up and came over towards me. He pushed me on the shoulder. I went back against the door. Peter Howarth came into the room and said to me, "You know why you are here". I said that I didn't. Peter Howarth left the room. Wilson began to undress me. I was wearing a short‑sleeved shirt and trousers. He took off my shirt and trousers. I took off my underpants. I left my sandals on. As I was taking my underpants off, Peter Howarth returned to the room. He was carrying a small brown cardboard shoe box which he put on to the coffee table. I couldn't see inside the box. Mr. Wilson then said "We're going to teach you a lesson you'll never forget".Mr. Howarth produced three pairs of handcuffs. He handed over pair to Mr. Wilson who handcuffed my ankles. Mr. Howarth handcuffed my hands behind my back.Mr. Howarth then produced a flesh coloured 'Dildo' (artificial penis) from the box, he then produced a black object, it was slightly shorter than the Dildo and had spikes on. I don't know what it was made of.Mr. Howarth immediately pushed the black object with spikes on up my back passage, he never used any form of lubrication. He then used the Dildo to push the black object further into my back passage. As he was doing this both were laughing.Paul Wilson then stood in front of me, he unzipped his trousers, he was masturbating himself, and then he made me suck his penis. I can't recall if he came into my mouth. Although I don't recall actually blacking out everything that occurred afterwards is a total blank. I don't recall leaving Peter Howarth's flat that day. I can only recall having difficulty walking for several days after, several boys remarked about this but I don't recall who they were. This is the first time I have been able to recollect these two incidents since they occurred because of the effect they have had on me emotionally.I felt it difficult to repeat these and the other incidents because of fear of the people involved and the only reason I have chosen to say anything now is because I have been approached by the Police and I feel it is time to say something to prevent the same thing happening to other boys."

The same person spent time in jail for perverting the course of justice.

In laws et al.